Civil Rights Law Reviewer

Alexandra Vaughn

Alexandra Vaughn is a seasoned legal expert with a strong background in civil rights law. She has spent over two decades reviewing and editing content related to employment discrimination and voting rights. Her expertise has been sought after by numerous organizations and publications. Alexandra is committed to ensuring the accuracy and relevance of legal content.

Credentials

Senior Civil Rights Reviewer

20+ yearsEmployment DiscriminationVoting Rights

Reviewed posts

Articles reviewed by Alexandra Vaughn

Miller-El v. Cockrell's Ruling on Jury DiscriminationHudson v. McMillian: Cruel and Unusual PunishmentWhat Is the Sherbert Test from Sherbert v. Verner?Dunn v. Blumstein and Voter Residency RequirementsSeidenberg v. Summit Bank: A Landmark ADA CaseFrisby v. Schultz: Balancing Protest and PrivacyLloyd Corporation v. Tanner: Private Property vs. Free SpeechThe Mueller v. Allen Supreme Court DecisionCarey v. Piphus: Proving Actual Injury for DamagesPerez v. Sharp and the Fundamental Right to MarryScrews v. United States: The “Willful” Intent StandardDoe v. Boyertown Area School District Case ExplainedLynch v. Donnelly and the Establishment ClauseChristian Legal Society v. Martinez ExplainedMarshall v. City of Portland: Taser Use as Excessive ForceThe Johnson v. City of Grants Pass Supreme Court DecisionFilarsky v. Delia: Qualified Immunity for Private ActorsDeaf Rights, Accessibility, and the Supreme CourtLegal Services Corp. v. Velazquez: A Supreme Court CaseLomax v. Ortiz-Marquez and the Three-Strikes RuleThe Regina Kelly v. John Paschall Civil Rights CaseThe Wikimedia vs NSA Lawsuit Over Mass SurveillancePena v. Leombruni: Qualified Immunity and Unlawful DetentionThe Wilson v. Lane Ruling on Media Ride-AlongsHow People v. Miller Defined the Obscenity TestThe SFFA v. Harvard Supreme Court Affirmative Action CaseChandler v. Miller and the Fourth AmendmentKorematsu v. United States: An APUSH DefinitionEgbert v. Boule and the Limits on Suing Federal AgentsThe VMI Supreme Court Case and Its Landmark Ruling